🔗 Share this article

Deductibles. Preferred providers. Out-of-network. Concierge medical services. Personal healthcare costs. Fixed payment. Shared insurance. Benefit advisers. Coverage agents. Medical advisors. ACA. Health Maintenance Organization. Preferred Provider Organization. EPO. POS. High Deductible Health Plan. Health Savings Account. Flexible Spending Account. Health Reimbursement Arrangement. EOB. COBRA. SHOP. Single coverage. Dependent coverage. Insurance subsidies.

Confused? It's understandable. Who comprehends all this stuff? Certainly not the average business owner. Neither the average employee. Choosing the right healthcare insurance for our business – or for our families – seems like it requires a PhD in healthcare.

The Healthcare System Isn't Just Complex, It's Costly

According to recent research, typical households pays $twenty-seven thousand each year for their health insurance (increasing by 6% from last year). The average company healthcare expense is expected to surpass $seventeen thousand per employee by 2026, an increase of 9.5% compared to 2025.

Now the government has ceased functioning due to political disagreements regarding tax credits that experts say will lead to a doubling of premiums for numerous US citizens.

When Will We Truly Examine Universal Healthcare?

When will we genuinely evaluate a national health insurance program here in America? I have to believe we're approaching that point because this situation is unsustainable.

I'm not suggesting national healthcare. I'm proposing for our current Medicare system – an established insurance framework – merely extend to include all citizens. Our infrastructure remains intact. How medical professionals receive payment would change. Believe me, they will adjust.

How Universal Coverage Could Function

Universal healthcare coverage would require payments from both employees and employers. In comparable systems, an employee making average wages pays approximately five point three percent to their healthcare. The company must contribute approximately thirteen point seventy-five percent.

Does this seem like a lot? Not if you contrast it to what the typical American pays. I can name multiple clients who are easily contributing anywhere from eight to fifteen percent of their employee wages to their healthcare costs. Remember that in comprehensive systems, those payments also cover retirement benefits, illness coverage, parental benefits and unemployment benefits along with funding medical services. When you add these expenses versus what we pay on retirement programs, unemployment insurance and paid time off, the gap narrows.

Implementation in the US

In the US, universal healthcare funding would increase existing Medicare taxes, a framework already established. It ought to be means-based – those at higher income levels would contribute higher amounts than lower-income earners. This includes both an employee and company payments. And, like much of federal defense, IT, social programs and transportation services, the program should be outsourced by private contractors rather than a government office.

Benefits for Entrepreneurs

A national health insurance program represents a significant advantage for entrepreneurs like mine. It would put small companies in equal competition with our larger competitors who can afford better plans. It would make administration significantly simpler (a payroll deduction processed similarly to social security and healthcare taxes, instead of separate payments to insurance companies and coverage administrators).

It would make simpler to plan expenses our yearly costs, rather than enduring the complicated (and fruitless) process of bargaining with the big insurance providers required annually each year. Due to simplification, there would be improved comprehension of coverage by our employees – as opposed to the current system which require them to interpret the complications of current options. Additionally there would definitely exist reduced responsibility for employers as we no longer have access to our employees' health histories for purposes of risk assessment and different options.

Free-Market Viewpoint

I'm as pro-market as possible. But I've learned that public institutions play important functions in society, including national security to funding essential systems. Providing healthcare to all via universal healthcare strengthens our economy's infrastructure. It represents superior, easier system for small businesses that employ the majority of the country's workers and fund half the economic output. It makes it possible for workers to enjoy better health, come to work more often and increase productivity.

Considering Challenges

Exist numerous factors I'm not addressing? Of course there are. But with rising medical expenses experienced in recent years, it's clear that the Affordable Care Act is not working effectively. I understand that we're not a small, Scandinavian country where major reforms can be readily adopted. But expanding universal Medicare, despite increased taxation required, would remain a better and more affordable strategy both for managing medical expenses but providing access to everyone.

Need for Realistic Evaluation

We as Americans, we need to tone down national pride. America's medical care isn't so great. We rank well below many other countries with the best healthcare globally, based on comprehensive research. Perhaps a bright spot in this present circumstances could be that we undertake serious examination at ourselves and agree that major reforms need to happen.