🔗 Share this article

Families of people buried in graves vulnerable to shoreline retreat say that a lack of decision over how to tackle the issue is creating unnecessary distress concerning the final resting places of their loved ones.

An Impending Threat to Historic Graveyards

The council have identified three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being engulfed by the sea in the next few generations.

A recent report on the situation sets out a range of options, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and relocating them in safer sites. Officials maintain it is for local people to determine how to move forward.

“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. My parents intended this to be their final resting place, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”

Estimates suggest at least a portion of one churchyard could fall into the waves in the next 80 years, but some residents worry it will happen much sooner. “In my view it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” one said.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner recalled a childhood visit to the neighbouring village of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the water, including its church and graveyard.

“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get carried away to the ocean. They won’t. Individuals will collect remains as souvenirs and go grave robbing in search of valuables. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I’m worried that the identical fate that happened at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the beach. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Paratrooper's Grave in Peril

Further up the coast is situated the burial plot of a former paratrooper killed while serving abroad. His parent said she could not sleep after discovering her child's grave might one day be relocated.

“It does trouble me to think this won’t be his permanent resting place,” she said. “To our family it’s an significant site to visit.”

She believes, new burials should stop but says it is premature to exhume existing graves. “My preference for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an early decision needs to be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Searching for Answers and Clarity

The lack of consensus over the timing and method to tackle the problem has left bereaved families feeling frustrated and worried.

Several families want additional coastal protections to slow the inevitable erosion and to permit funerals to continue for now. Others contend the moment for relocation is approaching.

“It is very emotive,” a family member stated. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is implemented. And all parties is washing their hands over who is accountable.”

A local official confirmed the graveyards were owned and managed of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is up to them to choose the path to take. We are here to help support them through that process with residents.”

It was also stated there was time to consider all the choices. “We are talking many years before it begins getting lost.”

“Currently, there exists no common view on what should happen yet. We need good community discussions to find the appropriate solutions for each community.”

The prospect of losing the churches and graveyards was described as one of “profound sorrow for the area,” but church representatives also referenced a belief in resurrection, offering a spiritual perspective on the physical disappearance of hallowed earth.