🔗 Share this article

Only two days before the NYC race for mayor, political analyst Michael Lange issued a bold forecast – not just who would win overall, and precinct by precinct. The analyst, a political analyst who grew up in New York City, has spent over a decade in left-leaning activism and emerged as a kind of well-known figure this year for his deep dives into municipal statistics and polling.

He published his highly detailed prediction map – which correctly forecast that the progressive candidate would win while missing Andrew Cuomo’s solid showing – on his newsletter, the Narrative War. He has a flair for clever terms. He pointed out, as an example, the split between the “commie corridor”, running from one neighborhood to another area to Astoria, where he predicted (correctly) that Mamdani would triumph by large leads, and the “capitalist corridor” on affluent parts of Manhattan. There, “the Free Press and Wall Street Journal outrank the New York Times” in audience and most voters favored Cuomo, campaigning as a moderate alternative.

Election Night Patterns and Surprises

What was your night?

It was necessary because they were adding approximately 200K votes into the system every few minutes! I was actually somewhat anxious at the beginning: The candidate led the initial ballots by 12 points, but came large groups of votes that came in later and his lead went from 12 to 8%. It was concerning.

You know, it was possible in which election day turned out kind of poorly for him, where the opponent would have basically doubling his votes from the earlier contest. However the winner added 500,000 votes to his primary coalition, and that’s a huge reason why he won. He campaigned and greatly broadened his base from the primary.

Expanding Support

How did Mamdani gain those extra votes from?

He assembled the alliance that progressives always wanted to build: it’s multiracial, it’s young, it’s renters and it’s people facing cost pressures. He improved considerably with Black and Hispanic voters, working- and middle-class voters, relative to the primary. Plus he further maximized his base of liberal progressives, young leftists, and immigrant groups. Victory required without making those significant inroads.

He built the alliance that progressives long aimed for: multiracial, youthful, tenants and people squeezed by affordability

There were also some supporters of both candidates – is that a big trend?

It’s definitely a genuine phenomenon, limited to working-class Latinos, south Asians and Muslims. Voters in immigrant strongholds that went for Trump previously went for Zohran this year. But I wouldn’t say he was winning over white working-class voters and Trump loyalists.

Turnout and Impact

One of the big stories of the night was the record turnout. Who benefited?

Each candidate. Participation was significantly higher than anticipated. I figured we might go over two million, but it’s closer to 2.3M – which is a lot of darn voters. There was a decent anti-Mamdani block, who were motivated, but the Mamdani base was also motivated, and that sufficed to win.

You forecasted he’d exceed half the ballots. Is he on course for that?

Currently you would say he’s likely to surpass half. He’s at just over 50% but there’s still around 200K ballots left to report at that time. Thus it’s not certain, but I believe it’s likely, and I wish he does because afterwards no one can say Sliwa was a spoiler.

GOP Decline

Curtis Sliwa, the Republican candidate, was another surprise. His support completely collapsed.

He didn’t win a single precinct in any borough. Not even one neighborhood in Staten Island, similar to an 88% Trump neighborhood. That truly was unexpected. Cuomo held very white areas, affluent zones and very religiously Jewish areas, and then added all of these Republicans on the island who had a strong turnout. I think there was a lot of tactical voting by GOP voters. This happened prior to Trump tweeted his support for the candidate, but it assisted. It could have even turned the tide if the winning alliance failed to expand.

Progressive Strongholds

Regarding your much mentioned “commie corridor” – did backing for the candidate dominant in those parts of the boroughs?

I think existed a little dilution of the commie corridor in certain places like Astoria or Greenpoint that have more older white ethnic folks. There, instance, the Greek landlords and residents supported Cuomo. So there existed a little resistance. However no, mostly the commie corridor is a key factor why Mamdani won – he was polling between 77% and 83% in Fort Greene, Clinton Hill and Bushwick.

Community Support

In the lead-up to the vote there was coverage on whether Mamdani was gaining ground with Jewish New Yorkers. Any indication that he did?

There are neighborhoods with a lot of secular and more progressive-leaning Jews – such as Park Slope and Morningside Heights – where he did well. However in the wealthy Jewish communities like the Manhattan area, his position on Israel definitely mattered there. Likewise in the moderate communities like Forest Hills, Rego Park, or Spuyten Duyvil and Riverdale – they all leaned Cuomo. Plus, you have newcomers from the former Soviet Union in the borough, who were strongly supportive. Therefore it’s unclear if existed crazy narrative-busters on this one, but he did hold left-leaning areas and even parts of the another locale with large leads.

Political Impact

Did Mamdani redefine what the city represents in politics? Will the commie corridor become a launch pad for leftwing candidates?

Yes, it’s no coincidence that key political leaders from the left hail from a few areas in Brooklyn, Queens and the Bronx. I’m sure that we’ll see more of that – people will come from these areas to be elevated nationally.

But I think that each urban center in the US could develop their own commie corridor. Cities are the centers of leftwing power in the nation – because they’re young, people rent and they are places where people are crushed by the inequalities exist.